Author |
Message |
Clamination
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:23 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:49 pm Posts: 198 Location: Miami, FL Gender: male
|
@Kenny, Do gays wanna have heterosexual wedded couple benefits? Yes right? All I'm saying is, don't call it marriage, and ppl will be happy. Im not saying bring God, Jesus, Buddha, Zeus, or any other religous symbol into the topic, its just that in THOSE RELIGIONS, and many others too, they would much rather prefer it to NOT call it gay "marriage". Marriage symbolizes the unionship of a man and wife.
Civil Union would be a helluva lot better a term for people to be comfortable with. If you were to put a survey right now about the name for it, I bet you most people would agree with me. And don't even joke about arresting me, as I take that kind of language very seriously.
@mrducky, Yeah I know. But the shock factors your using, you could ease up a bit on. I mean, sending a video about a rabbit humping a kitten? That kinda gives a verbose message to those reading this topic.
_________________

I've come to claim to your cookies. >:D Alliances: TmR-X7-5th
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:39 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
Kenny wrote: I don't see how a marriage is any different than a civil union. People who don't believe in the Bible still get married. If your point of it being a sacrament actually mattered to anyone then why should any member of any other religion get to use the term "marriage"
appealing to religious tones doesnt really work on me. the current definition and basis of marriage is a man and a women. my argument still stands that to change this definition means you must be open to changing it for the plethora of others "unions" out there.
If you want to call it a civil union, you have literally changed nothing. Perhaps you've settled a few people's nerves, but them having nerves in the first place is illogical anyways.
Should I make a religion right now and define the word franoodlecaking as speaking? Then by my religion, I am against franoodlecaking, as specifically only members of Melfinism may franoodlecake. Don't even bother replying to my post as if you gregreiate, I may just have to have you arrested! depends where you live, if its a theocracy then yes, i could be arrested, unfortunately youll need to extradite me from australia where the constitution protects me from certain... people. Quote: @mrducky, Yeah I know. But the shock factors your using, you could ease up a bit on. I mean, sending a video about a rabbit humping a kitten? That kinda gives a verbose message to those reading this topic.
you have never had your leg humped by a puppy? besides, i found it adorable. tasteless, yes, but adorable.
_________________

-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
Clamination
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 7:11 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:49 pm Posts: 198 Location: Miami, FL Gender: male
|
Kenny wrote: Clamination wrote: Marriage is a term used for religious ceremonies and is also a Catholic Sacrament.
That Sacrament is meant for women and men together. Not men and men or women and women. Clamination wrote: Im not saying bring God, Jesus, Buddha, Zeus, or any other religous symbol into the topic. Contradictory. There have been 3 different definitions of Marriage, someone define it before I even care to post anything more. Are you paying attention to just that? Or are you reading the rest of the text, but ignoring it?
_________________

I've come to claim to your cookies. >:D Alliances: TmR-X7-5th
|
|
Top |
|
TheMasterOfGames
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:45 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:14 pm Posts: 1622 Location: California, USA
|
Again, I'm still neutral on this, but I believe marriage is 2 human beings coming together and forming a very close relationship. For side: No matter what the gender of the partner, it is still love. People should deserve the right to love. Even if gay marriage is banned, this love cannot be broken. Against side: Traditional marriage has been a man and a women. It's human nature to keep traditions, and it's also very important. Also, something I didn't say before. I have met many people, many of which, homosexual. I'm sorry to say but I've had a bad reputation with homosexuals. I've heard that they dance half nude on the streets, and the excuse they come up with is "expressing themselves". NOT this kind of expression, and definitely NOT in public. The ones I have actually met personally are very perverted and vulgar. They use the most disgusting language and jokes. If 2 were to marry and get children, I'd just feel sorry for the children with these kind of parents... Well then...maybe I am against gay marriage. But I do still think they should have their rights...but idk anymore. 
_________________ TMOG has left.
No signatures will be made.
Spam Day RPs have been thrown away.
Tittle as Maintenance Team and GM as been abandoned.
Good luck with the forums, you'll need it.
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:25 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
TheMasterOfGames wrote: Also, something I didn't say before. I have met many people, many of which, homosexual. I'm sorry to say but I've had a bad reputation with homosexuals. I've heard that they dance half nude on the streets, and the excuse they come up with is "expressing themselves". NOT this kind of expression, and definitely NOT in public. The ones I have actually met personally are very perverted and vulgar. They use the most disgusting language and jokes. If 2 were to marry and get children, I'd just feel sorry for the children with these kind of parents...
1. perhaps it wasnt just them being gay that makes them behave like that, perhaps they were/are douchebags. 2. go to any major cities streets at 2 am and when the drunkards come out, those people are far worse, should this impact heterosexual relationships? no. 3. not everyone is fit to be a parent. homosexual or not, the criteria goes beyond sexuality. Kenny wrote: I read your entire post, it still contradicts your earlier argument in which you have given 2 different definitions for marriage. Mr Ducky provided the 3rd.
Is the union between two people, male and female that is legally recognised and carries with it rights and priveledges.
_________________

-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
TheMasterOfGames
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:29 am |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:14 pm Posts: 1622 Location: California, USA
|
Well I haven't met many people as messed up as the homosexuals...sorry for being harsh here but I'm just speaking my mind.
_________________ TMOG has left.
No signatures will be made.
Spam Day RPs have been thrown away.
Tittle as Maintenance Team and GM as been abandoned.
Good luck with the forums, you'll need it.
|
|
Top |
|
MmCm6
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 6:45 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:02 pm Posts: 1373 Location: Not at liberty to tell. Gender: male
|
Ok, by that definition, I would like to bring this up: Quote: Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. that is from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (which I've been using a bit in debates) set by the UN. While not legally binding, it indirectly pressures countries into accepting its ideals and sets standards for countries to follow. So gay marriage, by that definition, violates the Declaration, and pretty soon, countries would be pressured into taking gay marriage as a right. Why not start now and avoid the risk of being left behind in the world stage and make your country look socially backwards? As for religion, as mrducky said, it hasn't been mentioned in the Bible. I think people are starting to believe that what isn't in the Bible is wrong in the eyes of God now....
_________________

So yeah, I'm the guy everyone eventually hates.
[Advice for the New Player Here]
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 4:40 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
TheMasterOfGames wrote: Well I haven't met many people as messed up as the homosexuals...sorry for being harsh here but I'm just speaking my mind. i have met some heterosexual people who are REALLY messed up, i havent met many people as messed up as the heterosexuals. and some humans i have met are really messed up, ergo all humans are messed up you are generalising from how many homosexual people you have met? was it a one off thing where all of them were drunk or is this a day to day connection/contact with homosexuals? i know you believe you are "just speaking your mind" but you are coming off as quite the tool. thats me speaking my mind. as for the topic at hand, im not even sure which side im arguing against which arguments. ill take my leave until something shiny sparks my interest.
_________________

-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
Tom
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:44 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:12 pm Posts: 1908 Location: Lancaster, UK
|
I'm all for removing all legal benefits involved with marriage and transferring them to Civil Partnerships.
Let the baby have his bottle and make marriages straight-exclusive, but take away the point of getting married and switch it over to Civil Partnerships. See how many of those fundamental Christians are waiting in line with the gays for one.
_________________ MGH, BYZ, =T=, XOXO, Neko, Meow, CAE, DRAW, ROTR, Sky, EVIL, RAWR, MiG Leader of BD's first ever 100k+ alliance. (Sky - 100740 score - M1A2) E3, M1, M2 and F1 World Admin
|
|
Top |
|
mrducky
|
Post subject: Re: Gay marriage. Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:31 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm Posts: 781 Gender: male
|
Routhy wrote: I'm all for removing all legal benefits involved with marriage and transferring them to Civil Partnerships.
Let the baby have his bottle and make marriages straight-exclusive, but take away the point of getting married and switch it over to Civil Partnerships. See how many of those fundamental Christians are waiting in line with the gays for one. nice bump. i guess you have to face that society is money driven
_________________

-~~Retired Spammer~~-
~Agnostic atheist pastafarian~
Discussion+debates and World Events.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|