Author |
Message |
Xeeron
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:59 pm |
|
Second Lieutenant |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 170
|
News from the war. This time, going from nice to good to excellent. No 1: Damienkil (LAVV). His first priority since the war started: To farm the crystals of L4W (the other LAW sub) to "secure" them. Moving his army to a save place after logging of seems to have been a distant second.  No 2: ASH (LAW) Always parked alone. Except once, when he moved to the common LAW parking spot. Sadly for him, LAW switched the spot soon after ...  No 3: Josey Whales (LAW) LAW deviced a cunning plan to trap us by placing their spies in one of our new OPs. They did have enough infiltration for a lockdown, but we had enough backup ready. Eventually all LAW attackers realised the attack was futile, with one exception:  - Xeeron
|
|
Top |
|
deathral22
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 6:33 pm |
|
Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 21
|
Xeeron wrote: News from the war. This time, going from nice to good to excellent. No 1: Damienkil (LAVV). His first priority since the war started: To farm the crystals of L4W (the other LAW sub) to "secure" them. Moving his army to a save place after logging of seems to have been a distant second.  No 2: ASH (LAW) Always parked alone. Except once, when he moved to the common LAW parking spot. Sadly for him, LAW switched the spot soon after ...  No 3: Josey Whales (LAW) LAW deviced a cunning plan to trap us by placing their spies in one of our new OPs. They did have enough infiltration for a lockdown, but we had enough backup ready. Eventually all LAW attackers realised the attack was futile, with one exception:  - Xeeron I may not agree with Damielkil's methods, but he isn't stupid. He was out of oil and we couldn't give him any. He barely was able to relocate. He had like 11 oil when your attack hit. ~LAVV leader
|
|
Top |
|
Xeeron
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 3:38 am |
|
Second Lieutenant |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 170
|
deathral22 wrote: I may not agree with Damielkil's methods, but he isn't stupid. He was out of oil and we couldn't give him any. He barely was able to relocate. He had like 11 oil when your attack hit.
~LAVV leader
His units just came back from an attack on a (banned) L4W member. The oil wasted in that attack would have easily saved his army. As I said, his priorities were off and he got killed for it. - Xeeron
|
|
Top |
|
Xeeron
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 6:36 am |
|
Second Lieutenant |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 170
|
Latest news: Wild East save again, Jesse James killed!  Hell have their share of suicide pilots (and horrible fleet setups) as well:  - Xeeron
|
|
Top |
|
bossbozz
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:38 am |
|
Corporal |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 7:58 pm Posts: 59
|
Any LAW victories yet?
_________________ GS "Perfect 10" Earth 5 - Era 1 - 1 Alliance - No Subs
|
|
Top |
|
deathral22
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:57 pm |
|
Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 21
|
Yeah, LAW has won aswell. They just aren't posting. Here is a quick one  that was just the first one i could find, there is more. I have a good portion of the LAVV BR's, but i'm too lazy to post them
|
|
Top |
|
Xeeron
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 5:19 pm |
|
Second Lieutenant |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 170
|
You are not lazy, you just had to wait for that BR being made (it is barely a few hours old). So spice this threat up and post some more. =)
- Xeeron
|
|
Top |
|
deathral22
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:07 pm |
|
Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 21
|
@Xeeron. We also have this battle report. Don't think you know everything. LAVV is a very competent alliance which is always active and is not getting raped by 100 squads right now http://i55.tinypic.com/2lvb86t.pngWe dominated that battle report too. I have like 20 more like it too. SOLD better run
|
|
Top |
|
Xeeron
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 4:08 am |
|
Second Lieutenant |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 170
|
deathral22 wrote: @Xeeron. We also have this battle report. Don't think you know everything. LAVV is a very competent alliance which is always active and is not getting *CENSORED* by 100 squads right now http://i55.tinypic.com/2lvb86t.pngWe dominated that battle report too. I have like 20 more like it too. SOLD better run Uhhh, yes, you totally dominated our two Riflemen! Must have hurt for us, losing those. And even 20 more? Summing up you killed a bit more than one full squad of them! Ouch.  Ok, after that funny interlude, back to some real battle reports. Guess where the first happened? At the colony of someone in a "very competent alliance which is always active and is not getting *CENSORED* by 100 squads right now". Looks like those 100 squads did have the last laugh. =P  And someone in from Hell returning home there:  - Xeeron
|
|
Top |
|
deathral22
|
Post subject: Re: SoLD vs LAW Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 7:25 am |
|
Specialist |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 6:20 pm Posts: 21
|
Xeeron wrote: deathral22 wrote: @Xeeron. We also have this battle report. Don't think you know everything. LAVV is a very competent alliance which is always active and is not getting *CENSORED* by 100 squads right nowhttp://i55.tinypic.com/2lvb86t.pngWe dominated that battle report too. I have like 20 more like it too. SOLD better run Uhhh, yes, you totally dominated our two Riflemen! Must have hurt for us, losing those. And even 20 more? Summing up you killed a bit more than one full squad of them! Ouch.  Ok, after that funny interlude, back to some real battle reports. Guess where the first happened? At the colony of someone in a "very competent alliance which is always active and is not getting *CENSORED* by 100 squads right now". Looks like those 100 squads did have the last laugh. =P  And someone in from Hell returning home there:  - Xeeron That very competent alliance this was a joke, and i don't have time for this game so i thought i would get concured and let it be over with.  I told you when my shield ended lol. I'm not stupid. I know thats how you get auto-concurred.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|