Author |
Message |
OmegaXII
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:19 am |
|
Lieutenant Major |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:24 pm Posts: 2325 Location: no location for you Gender: female
|
calling me stupid
_________________

 PSN: aLpHaOmEgAXII
|
|
Top |
|
MiKolives
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:13 pm |
|
Private 1st class |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:14 am Posts: 11
|
well,,, when the unstoppable force meets the immovable object, it merely passes by and says; "your life must be boring." to the object and continues right on it's way... orrr conceding the implication that these two objects are colliding,, the unstoppable force reverses, or bounces because of the equal and opposite force of the immovable object. you two are just mind rapeing each other... i don't get it
-Mikz
_________________

|
|
Top |
|
Twilightmask
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:16 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:47 pm Posts: 534 Location: Fantasy 4
|
MiKolives wrote: well,,, when the unstoppable force meets the immovable object, it merely passes by and says; "your life must be boring." to the object and continues right on it's way... orrr conceding the implication that these two objects are colliding,, the unstoppable force reverses, or bounces because of the equal and opposite force of the immovable object. you two are just mind rapeing each other... i don't get it
-Mikz This brilliant alternate view point (props bro!) has inspired me to reconsider the question. It's so obvious, that I can't believe I didn't realize it before! The key to this game is not in the answer but in the realization that the question has many answers! MiKolives reveals this with his beautifully phrased retort. How wonderful! I feel like a Samurai in training, just grasping the deeper meaning behind an exercise I have been doing for days. My answer: The Unstoppable force will meet the Immovable object and the Immovable object will permit the force to go through it, remaining unmoved. Thus ... neither entity compromises its essential nature while all conditions of the original statement are met satisfactorily. It goes through! The whole question was a freaking martial arts mind game! Brilliant!
_________________ Fallen Angel- The Poet King of KRAW [F4] The Priest of RAGE [F4]
|
|
Top |
|
daerduo
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 9:02 am |
|
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 6:20 am Posts: 576
|
NO The unstoppable force is a force that can move anything, not a force that cannot be stopped from exerting. We've been through this and you've agreed with me on several occasions--force that cannot be stopped from exerting is a constant, not unstoppable force. The force passing through the object means that the force has not succeeded in moving the object, only that the force has not been stopped from exerting (i.e., constant).
And Miks second point is incorrect since the unstoppable force has been stopped and reversed.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
MiKolives
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:16 am |
|
Private 1st class |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:14 am Posts: 11
|
|
Top |
|
Twilightmask
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:45 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:47 pm Posts: 534 Location: Fantasy 4
|
daerduo wrote: NO The unstoppable force is a force that can move anything, not a force that cannot be stopped from exerting. We've been through this and you've agreed with me on several occasions--force that cannot be stopped from exerting is a constant, not unstoppable force. The force passing through the object means that the force has not succeeded in moving the object, only that the force has not been stopped from exerting (i.e., constant).
Stop making it so complicated Duo! You are adding superfluous definitions to a relatively simple concept that has relatively no relation to the original concept. Just because the Unstoppable Force moved through an object doesn't mean it was stopped. Just because a force moved through it doesn't mean the Immovable object was moved... My point remains.
_________________ Fallen Angel- The Poet King of KRAW [F4] The Priest of RAGE [F4]
|
|
Top |
|
OmegaXII
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:50 pm |
|
Lieutenant Major |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:24 pm Posts: 2325 Location: no location for you Gender: female
|
who even thought of putting this on here???
maybe when they hit the energy of them is so powerful the universe explodes or maybe they pass right through each other if they pass through the force isnt stopped and the object isnt moved
_________________

 PSN: aLpHaOmEgAXII
|
|
Top |
|
MiKolives
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:33 pm |
|
Private 1st class |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:14 am Posts: 11
|
|
Top |
|
OmegaXII
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:10 pm |
|
Lieutenant Major |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:24 pm Posts: 2325 Location: no location for you Gender: female
|
its just a jet running into a wall there are no such things as unstoppable forces or immovable objects the mass for the object would be so great that it would collapse into itself and create a black hole or singularity
_________________

 PSN: aLpHaOmEgAXII
|
|
Top |
|
Seth
|
Post subject: Re: unstoppable force vs immovable object Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:18 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:47 pm Posts: 2416 Location: U.S.A. Gender: male
|
This one is easy.
There is no unstoppable force, and there is no immovable object. These two objects do not exist.
Therefore, you are basically debating whether leprechauns or fairies are more real.
There is no such thing as an unstoppable force, and there is no such thing as an immovable object.
Case in point, say you call a mountain an immovable object. The problem is that the earth moves, so therefore the mountain itself is already moving. Also, tectonic plates etc. but you get my point.
You would do better to debate whether the chicken or the egg came first.
If you wish to continue this debate, you should provide examples. Otherwise, you are uselessly debating fairy tales. There is NO right answer for a scenario that does not exist.
_________________ Battle Dawn Staff Community Management Specialist Technical Support World Administrator Music Composer
Welcome to the best free multiplayer war strategy game on the web!
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|